Chelsea NYHCA Houses Demolition Halted Until at Least May
An appeals court extended a restraining order on NYCHA’s plans to overhaul the Fulton and Elliott-Chelsea Houses until late spring, at the earliest, when another hearing is scheduled.
A lawsuit filed by tenants seeking to halt the demolition of the Fulton and Elliott-Chelsea Houses has been given further life, with a five-judge appeals court panel substantially extending a restraining order against NYCHA on March 26.
The next hearing on the subject is set for May 19. A definitive ruling on the now-interlinked fate of the public housing complexes may come down from the court not long afterwards, although it could also theoretically take months.
NYCHA and two private developers (Related Co., Essence) are seeking to replace 19 historic buildings with a new consolidated mixed-use development, which will include 2,500 new market-rate apartments. The project was originally conceived under Eric Adams’s mayoral administration, as part of a broader push to privatize public housing stock.
Specifically, appellate court judges banned NYCHA “from taking any action in furtherance of its plan to convert, dispose of, demolish, and redevelop the Chelsea Developments public housing, pending hearing and determination of the aforesaid appeal.”
Former NYS Senator Tom Duane, who used to represent the Chelsea & Hell’s Kitchen neighborhoods, is also serving as a plaintiff in the lawsuit that earned the now-extended restraining order. An initial temporary restraining order was issued last month.
NYCHA has promised that current residents—who would remain displaced elsewhere during demolition and construction–-will receive fresh apartments in the new development, at the same rent-capped rate. Some residents, however, are pointedly resisting entreaties to move.
Community activist Layla Law-Gisiko, who is making her opposition to the demolition plans a cornerstone of her bid to win a special election for New York City Council’s District 3, celebrated the extension of the restraining order in an email blast.
“This morning, a panel of judges looked NYCHA in the eye (figuratively) and said: ‘Not today.’ We have a Temporary Restraining Order. Redevelopment is dead in its tracks until at least May 19,” she wrote. “The wrecking balls have been sent on a time out.”
“It turns out that ‘completely ignoring the tenants’ isn’t actually a valid legal strategy,” she added, calling the court decision “a delightful outbreak of common sense.”
Political wrangling over the demolition fight has also seeped into the congressional race to replace the retiring Jerry Nadler, with various would-be federal representatives staking out strikingly different positions.
State Assembly Member Micah Lasher, a protégé of Nadler, believes that NYCHA’s overhaul is warranted. “I am not going to tell the residents of [Elliott-Chelsea] and Fulton houses that the cavalry is going to come from Washington,” he told the outlet Gothamist, calling “renovation” via demolition the “less disruptive” option.
Lasher’s opponent Jack Schlossberg, a Democratic influencer and the only grandson of John F. Kennedy and Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, is running on a stance that mirrors Law-Gisiko’s. He shot a video at the Elliott-Chelsea Houses on March 6, where he interviewed residents that object to leaving.
“This building, yes it needs repairs, but it doesn’t need to be demolished,” he said. “The real issue here is [private] money.”
Meanwhile, NYCHA tenants elsewhere in Manhattan are rejecting similar bids to bring the private sector into their respective housing complexes.
Residents of the Isaacs Houses in Yorkville voted to continue funding building repairs via Section 9 on March 16, rather than switching to the New York City Public Housing Preservation Trust or the RAD-PACT program, which includes private funding.